↓ Skip to main content

When timing is key: How autocratic and democratic leadership relate to follower trust in emergency contexts

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
When timing is key: How autocratic and democratic leadership relate to follower trust in emergency contexts
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.904605
Pubmed ID
Authors

Florian Rosing, Diana Boer, Claudia Buengeler

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 164 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Researcher 7 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 6 4%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 103 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 17 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 5%
Arts and Humanities 5 3%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 101 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2023.
All research outputs
#15,588,794
of 23,932,398 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#16,943
of 31,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,640
of 435,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#567
of 1,884 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,932,398 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,884 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.