You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Perinatal derivatives: How to best characterize their multimodal functions in vitro. Part C: Inflammation, angiogenesis, and wound healing
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, August 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2022.965006 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ana I. Flores, Caterina Pipino, Urška Dragin Jerman, Sergio Liarte, Florelle Gindraux, Mateja Erdani Kreft, Francisco J. Nicolas, Assunta Pandolfi, Larisa Tratnjek, Bernd Giebel, Michela Pozzobon, Antonietta R. Silini, Ornella Parolini, Günther Eissner, Ingrid Lang-Olip |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 67% |
Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 17% |
Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 11 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2022.
All research outputs
#14,458,287
of 23,164,913 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#1,970
of 6,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,274
of 433,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#127
of 713 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,164,913 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,844 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 713 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.