The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Statements of the comparative Health of the British Navy, from the year 1779 to the year 1814, with proposals for its farther improvement.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, January 1815
|
DOI | 10.1177/095952871500600121 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gilbert Blane |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 33% |
Researcher | 1 | 33% |
Student > Master | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,599,199
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
#1,249
of 3,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12
of 207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them