The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Performance of TB-LAMP in the Diagnosis of Tuberculous Empyema Using Samples Obtained From Pleural Decortication
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, June 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2022.879772 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chang Liu, Lichao Fan, Jiansong Zhang, Qi Hong, Yi Ren, Huaiyu Tian, Yu Chen |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 20% |
Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 30% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 10% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2022.
All research outputs
#4,238,528
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,018
of 5,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,310
of 439,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#64
of 584 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 584 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.