The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of a novel optical smartphone blood pressure application: a method comparison study against invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring in intensive care unit patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Anesthesiology, August 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12871-022-01797-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Olivier Desebbe, Chbabou Anas, Brenton Alexander, Karim Kouz, Jean-Francois Knebel, Patrick Schoettker, Jacques Creteur, Jean-Louis Vincent, Alexandre Joosten |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 12% |
Researcher | 2 | 12% |
Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 18% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
Psychology | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2022.
All research outputs
#15,021,206
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#599
of 1,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,750
of 430,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#23
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,516 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.