The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
SCD2-mediated cooperative activation of IRF3-IRF9 regulatory circuit controls type I interferon transcriptome in CD4+ T cells
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, August 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2022.904875 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Toshio Kanno, Keisuke Miyako, Takahiro Nakajima, Satoru Yokoyama, Shigemi Sasamoto, Hikari K. Asou, Osamu Ohara, Toshinori Nakayama, Yusuke Endo |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 20% |
Netherlands | 1 | 20% |
India | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2022.
All research outputs
#14,892,082
of 26,169,168 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#12,135
of 33,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,834
of 436,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#632
of 2,071 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,169,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,071 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.