↓ Skip to main content

Diabetic Macular Edema and Diode Subthreshold Micropulse Laser A Randomized Double-Masked Noninferiority Clinical Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Ophthalmology, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
24 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diabetic Macular Edema and Diode Subthreshold Micropulse Laser A Randomized Double-Masked Noninferiority Clinical Trial
Published in
Ophthalmology, August 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.08.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noemi Lois, Christina Campbell, Norman Waugh, Augusto Azuara-Blanco, Mandy Maredza, Hema Mistry, Danny McAuley, Nachiketa Acharya, Tariq M. Aslam, Clare Bailey, Victor Chong, Louise Downey, Haralabos Eleftheriadis, Samia Fatum, Sheena George, Faruque Ghanchi, Markus Groppe, Robin Hamilton, Geeta Menon, Ahmed Saad, Sobha Sivaprasad, Marianne Shiew, David H. Steel, James Stephen Talks, Paul Doherty, Cliona McDowell, Mike Clarke, DIAMONDS Study Group

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 5 10%
Other 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Master 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 26 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 21%
Unspecified 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 29 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 195. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2023.
All research outputs
#218,229
of 26,623,929 outputs
Outputs from Ophthalmology
#84
of 6,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,202
of 438,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ophthalmology
#2
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,623,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.