The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Double jeopardy: How lower levels of support during COVID-19 exacerbated the relationship between loneliness and distress
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, August 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.976443 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sarah V. Bentley, Tarli Young, Belén Álvarez, Jolanda Jetten, Catherine Haslam, Tegan Cruwys, Bruno Gabriel Salvador Casara, Charlie R. Crimston, Michael Dare, Octavia Ionescu, Henning Krug, Hema Preya Selvanathan, Porntida Tanjitpiyanond, Niklas K. Steffens, Zhechen Wang, Susilo Wibisono |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
Lecturer | 2 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 10 | 56% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 5 | 28% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 10 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2022.
All research outputs
#15,005,535
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#4,144
of 10,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,074
of 432,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#386
of 1,340 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,340 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.