You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Guidelines for evaluating the conservation value of African lion (Panthera leo) translocations
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, September 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2022.963961 |
Authors |
Matthew S. Becker, Joao Almeida, Colleen Begg, Laura Bertola, Christine Breitenmoser, Urs Breitenmoser, Peter Coals, Paul Funston, Angela Gaylard, Rosemary Groom, Philipp Henschel, Dennis Ikanda, Agostinho Jorge, Johan Kruger, Peter Lindsey, Howard Maimbo, Roseline Mandisodza-Chikerema, Glynn Maude, Moreangels Mbizah, Susan M. Miller, Edwin Mudongo, Henry Mwape, Thandiwe Mweetwa, Vincent Naude, Vincent R. Nyirenda, Andrew Parker, Daniel Parker, Craig Reid, Ashley Robson, Ed Sayer, Jeanetta Selier, Mwamba Sichande, Chuma Simukonda, Kenneth Uiseb, Vivienne L. Williams, Dennis Zimba, Luke Hunter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 11 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
Scientists | 3 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 6 | 15% |
Researcher | 4 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 20 | 51% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 21% |
Unspecified | 6 | 15% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 20 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,450,018
of 26,558,362 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#61
of 444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,264
of 438,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#9
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,558,362 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.