The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Acceptability and feasibility of the World Health Organization's Caregiver Skills Training Programme (WHO CST) delivered via eLearning, videoconferencing, and in-person hybrid modalities in Hong Kong
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, September 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.915263 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Janet Siu-Ping Lau, Simon Man-Kin Lai, Florence To-Sau Ip, Paul Wai-Ching Wong, WHO CST Team, Chiara Servili, Erica Salomone, Laura Pacione, Stephanie Shire, Felicity L. Brown |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ecuador | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
Lecturer | 5 | 9% |
Researcher | 4 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Unknown | 26 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 7 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Unknown | 27 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2022.
All research outputs
#15,014,432
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#5,152
of 10,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,499
of 435,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#268
of 812 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 812 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.