The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A proof of concept infant-microbiota associated rat model for studying the role of gut microbiota and alleviation potential of Cutibacterium avidum in infant colic
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, August 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2022.902159 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Vanesa Natalin Rocha Martin, Christophe Del’Homme, Christophe Chassard, Clarissa Schwab, Christian Braegger, Annick Bernalier-Donadille, Christophe Lacroix |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 13% |
Researcher | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 25% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 13% |
Psychology | 1 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2022.
All research outputs
#14,635,726
of 23,426,104 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2,225
of 5,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,256
of 432,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#232
of 671 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,426,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,030 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 671 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.