The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
On the representation and processing of social information in grounded cognitive systems: why terminology matters
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00180 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kendall J. Eskine |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 25% |
Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 20 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 39% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
Professor | 2 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 16 | 70% |
Philosophy | 1 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2013.
All research outputs
#7,183,517
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#10,368
of 29,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,245
of 280,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#451
of 969 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 969 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.