You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A biologically inspired spiking neural P system in selective visual attention for efficient feature extraction from human motion
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Robotics and AI, September 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/frobt.2022.1028271 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Esteban Anides, Luis Garcia, Giovanny Sanchez, Juan-Gerardo Avalos, Marco Abarca, Thania Frias, Eduardo Vazquez, Emmanuel Juarez, Carlos Trejo, Derlis Hernandez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2022.
All research outputs
#14,393,870
of 23,507,888 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#767
of 1,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,597
of 436,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#25
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,507,888 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.