The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The value of surgical admissions for malignant uterine cancer. A comparative analysis of robotic, laparoscopic, and laparotomy surgery in a university hospital
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, October 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.920578 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maria Lucia Specchia, Giovanni Arcuri, Andrea Di Pilla, Emanuele La Gatta, Tommaso Osti, Prospero Limongelli, Giovanni Scambia, Rocco Domenico Alfonso Bellantone |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 2 | 29% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 13% |
Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 27% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 13% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 7% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2022.
All research outputs
#6,527,436
of 23,575,346 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,239
of 11,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,131
of 443,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#171
of 1,426 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,575,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,426 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.