The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Critical evaluation of asthma biomarkers in clinical practice
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, October 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2022.969243 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Giuseppe Guida, Diego Bagnasco, Vitina Carriero, Francesca Bertolini, Fabio Luigi Massimo Ricciardolo, Stefania Nicola, Luisa Brussino, Emanuele Nappi, Giovanni Paoletti, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Enrico Heffler |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 18% |
Unspecified | 3 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 18 | 53% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 24% |
Unspecified | 3 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 18 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#15,407,571
of 24,892,887 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,875
of 6,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,495
of 432,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#190
of 498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,892,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.