↓ Skip to main content

Acceptance and Perception of Artificial Intelligence Usability in Eye Care (APPRAISE) for Ophthalmologists: A Multinational Perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acceptance and Perception of Artificial Intelligence Usability in Eye Care (APPRAISE) for Ophthalmologists: A Multinational Perspective
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, October 2022
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2022.875242
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dinesh V. Gunasekeran, Feihui Zheng, Gilbert Y. S. Lim, Crystal C. Y. Chong, Shihao Zhang, Wei Yan Ng, Stuart Keel, Yifan Xiang, Ki Ho Park, Sang Jun Park, Aman Chandra, Lihteh Wu, J. Peter Campbel, Aaron Y. Lee, Pearse A. Keane, Alastair Denniston, Dennis S. C. Lam, Adrian T. Fung, Paul R. V. Chan, SriniVas R. Sadda, Anat Loewenstein, Andrzej Grzybowski, Kenneth C. S. Fong, Wei-chi Wu, Lucas M. Bachmann, Xiulan Zhang, Jason C. Yam, Carol Y. Cheung, Pear Pongsachareonnont, Paisan Ruamviboonsuk, Rajiv Raman, Taiji Sakamoto, Ranya Habash, Michael Girard, Dan Milea, Marcus Ang, Gavin S. W. Tan, Leopold Schmetterer, Ching-Yu Cheng, Ecosse Lamoureux, Haotian Lin, Peter van Wijngaarden, Tien Y. Wong, Daniel S. W. Ting

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Librarian 3 4%
Lecturer 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 40 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Unspecified 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 42 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2022.
All research outputs
#13,095,476
of 23,283,373 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,973
of 5,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,256
of 442,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#129
of 507 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,283,373 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 507 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.