The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Explore the Predictive Value of Peripheral Blood Cell Parameters in Refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae Pneumonia in Children Over 6 Years Old
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pediatrics, November 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fped.2021.659677 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yaoyao Ling, Jing Ning, Yongsheng Xu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 14% |
Engineering | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,221,948
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#725
of 6,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,551
of 431,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#49
of 455 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 455 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.