↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating a cross-lagged panel model between problematic internet use and psychological distress and cross-level mediation of school administrator support on problematic internet use: The serial…

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating a cross-lagged panel model between problematic internet use and psychological distress and cross-level mediation of school administrator support on problematic internet use: The serial mediating role of psychological needs thwarting of online teaching and psychological distress
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, November 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2022.987366
Pubmed ID
Authors

I-Hua Chen, Hsin-Pao Chen, Jeffrey H. Gamble, Xiao ling Liao, Xiu-Mei Chen, Ya-Ting Carolyn Yang, Amir H. Pakpour, Mark D. Griffiths, Chung-Ying Lin

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 17 65%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 17 65%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2022.
All research outputs
#6,476,552
of 23,979,422 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,234
of 11,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,609
of 447,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#164
of 1,505 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,979,422 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,505 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.