The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Altered functional association and couplings: Effective diagnostic neuromarkers for Alzheimer’s disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, October 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2022.1009632 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chongyi Zhao, Meiling Chen, Zhiyong Ding, Chunyan Liu, Xiaomei Wu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 2 | 22% |
Researcher | 2 | 22% |
Librarian | 1 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 2 | 22% |
Psychology | 1 | 11% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 11% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2022.
All research outputs
#4,229,660
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,028
of 4,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,677
of 438,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#115
of 333 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 333 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.