The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Probiotic effects of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus 1155 and Limosilactobacillus fermentum 2644 on hyperuricemic rats
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, September 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2022.993951 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yanjun Li, Jun Zhu, Guodong Lin, Kan Gao, Yunxia Yu, Su Chen, Lie Chen, Zuoguo Chen, Li Li |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 21% |
Student > Master | 3 | 21% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Professor | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 14% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 14% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2022.
All research outputs
#17,952,854
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2,868
of 4,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,877
of 438,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#316
of 631 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 631 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.