The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Underwater hearing in sea ducks with applications for reducing gillnet bycatch through acoustic deterrence
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Experimental Biology, October 2022
|
DOI | 10.1242/jeb.243953 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kathleen A. McGrew, Sarah E. Crowell, Jonathan L. Fiely, Alicia M. Berlin, Glenn H. Olsen, Jennifer James, Heather Hopkins, Christopher K. Williams |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 17% |
Researcher | 3 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 17% |
Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 33% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 22% |
Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2022.
All research outputs
#5,976,896
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Biology
#3,254
of 8,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,461
of 442,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Biology
#33
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.