↓ Skip to main content

“I don’t think people are ready to trust these algorithms at face value”: trust and the use of machine learning algorithms in the diagnosis of rare disease

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“I don’t think people are ready to trust these algorithms at face value”: trust and the use of machine learning algorithms in the diagnosis of rare disease
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, November 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12910-022-00842-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nina Hallowell, Shirlene Badger, Aurelia Sauerbrei, Christoffer Nellåker, Angeliki Kerasidou

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Professor 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 31 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Computer Science 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 32 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,157,181
of 25,048,615 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#211
of 1,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,811
of 395,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#7
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,048,615 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.