The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
In silico evidence for the utility of parsimonious root phenotypes for improved vegetative growth and carbon sequestration under drought
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2022.1010165 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ernst D. Schäfer, Ishan Ajmera, Etienne Farcot, Markus R. Owen, Leah R. Band, Jonathan P. Lynch |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 7% |
Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 12 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
Scientists | 3 | 21% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 38% |
Student > Master | 3 | 23% |
Professor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 38% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 15% |
Chemistry | 2 | 15% |
Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,357,376
of 26,411,386 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#403
of 25,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,169
of 509,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#13
of 1,414 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,411,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,363 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,414 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.