Lisa Flem Kalheim, Per Selnes, Atle Bjørnerud, Christopher Coello, Kjetil Vegge, Tormod Fladby
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most prevalent neurodegenerative disorder and cause of dementia and is characterized by amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. AD has traditionally been considered to primarily affect gray matter, but multiple lines of evidence also indicate white matter (WM) pathology and associated small-vessel cerebrovascular disease. WM glucose delivery and metabolism may have implications for local tissue integrity, and [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) may be helpful to assess neuroglial and axonal function in WM. Hypothesizing that affection of oligodendroglia will be associated with loss of glucose uptake, we aimed to investigate glucose metabolism in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) and normal-appearing WM in patients with and without evidence of amyloid plaques. Subjects with mild cognitive impairment or subjective cognitive decline were included and dichotomized according to pathological (Aβ+) or normal (Aβ-) concentrations of cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β 1-42. A total of 50 subjects were included, of whom 30 subjects were classified as Aβ(+) and 20 subjects as Aβ(-). All subjects were assessed with MRI and FDG-PET. FDG-PET images were corrected for effects of partial voluming and normalized to cerebellar WM, before determining WMH FDG-uptake. Although there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, WMH volume, number of individual WMHs, or WMH distribution, we found significantly lower (p = 0.021) FDG-uptake in WMHs in Aβ(+) subjects (mean = 0.662, SD = 0.113) compared to Aβ(-) subjects (mean = 0.596, SD = 0.073). There were no significant group differences in the FDG-uptake in normal-appearing WM. Similar results were obtained without correction for effects of partial voluming. Our findings add to the evidence for a link between Aβ dysmetabolism and WM pathology in AD.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2016.
All research outputs
#3,376,145
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#2,754
of 12,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,696
of 418,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#9
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
