The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparative analysis of medicinal plant Isodon rubescens and its common adulterants based on chloroplast genome sequencing
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2022.1036277 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zhongyu Zhou, Jing Wang, Tingting Pu, Jingjing Dong, Qin Guan, Jun Qian, Linchun Shi, Baozhong Duan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2022.
All research outputs
#14,921,226
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#9,243
of 20,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,478
of 437,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#570
of 1,355 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,837 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,355 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.