↓ Skip to main content

Labor induction information leaflets—Do women receive evidence-based information about the benefits and harms of labor induction?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Global Women's Health, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Labor induction information leaflets—Do women receive evidence-based information about the benefits and harms of labor induction?
Published in
Frontiers in Global Women's Health, November 2022
DOI 10.3389/fgwh.2022.936770
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter von Dadelszen, Susan Tohill, Julie Wade, Jennifer A. Hutcheon, Janet Scott, Marcus Green, James G. Thornton, Laura A. Magee, the WILL Pilot Trial Study Group

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Unspecified 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 10 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 4 24%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 12%
Unspecified 1 6%
Unknown 10 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2022.
All research outputs
#5,776,497
of 26,609,881 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Global Women's Health
#131
of 572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,556
of 507,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Global Women's Health
#6
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,609,881 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 507,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.