↓ Skip to main content

Extended adjuvant temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: A single-center retrospective study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extended adjuvant temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: A single-center retrospective study
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, November 2022
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2022.1000501
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jie Chen, Tingting Wang, Wanming Liu, Hui Qiu, Nie Zhang, Xueting Chen, Xin Ding, Longzhen Zhang

Abstract

To investigate whether extending adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) improved the prognosis of newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) patients with different mutation statuses of O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1), p53 and different expression level of Ki67. This study was a retrospective cohort study that postoperative patients with newly diagnosed GBM who did not progress after receiving radiotherapy with concomitant and 6 cycles of adjuvant TMZ were enrolled in control group, and those received more than 6 cycles of adjuvant TMZ were incorporated in extended group. Patients were stratified by MGMT expression, IDH1 mutation, p53 mutation and expression level of Ki67. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). A total of 93 postoperative patients with newly diagnosed GBM were included in this study, 40 and 53 cases were included in control group and extended group, respectively. On the whole, extended adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy significantly prolonged OS and PFS of patients with newly diagnosed GBM [median OS (mOS): 29.00 months vs. 16.70 months, P < 0.001; median PFS (mPFS): 13.80 months vs. 9.60 months, P = 0.002]. The results of subgroup analysis showed that patients with methylated MGMT in extended group had significantly longer OS and PFS than those in control group; patients with IDH1 mutation benefited more from extended adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy than those with wild-type IDH1; there was no significant difference in the effect of extended TMZ chemotherapy on OS between GBM patients with wild-type p53 and those with mutant p53; compared with GBM patients with lower expression of Ki67, extended adjuvant TMZ treatment dramatically improved the OS and PFS of those with higher expression of Ki67. The therapeutic schedule of extended adjuvant TMZ significantly prolonged OS and PFS of patients with newly diagnosed GBM regardless of p53 mutation status, and patients with different MGMT methylation, IDH1 mutation and Ki67 expression level benefited differently from extended adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2022.
All research outputs
#17,872,783
of 26,179,695 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#8,261
of 22,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,837
of 499,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#596
of 1,505 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,179,695 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,919 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 499,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,505 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.