↓ Skip to main content

The Intestinal Microbiota and Viral Susceptibility

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Intestinal Microbiota and Viral Susceptibility
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00092
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie K. Pfeiffer, Justin L. Sonnenburg

Abstract

Many infections start with microbial invasion of mucosal surfaces, which are typically colonized by a community of resident microbes. A growing body of literature demonstrates that the resident microbiota plays a significant role in host susceptibility to pathogens. Recent work has largely focused on the considerable effect that the intestinal microbiota can have upon bacterial pathogenesis. These studies reveal many significant gaps in our knowledge about the mechanisms by which the resident community impacts pathogen invasion and the nature of the ensuing host immune response. It is likely that as viral pathogens become the focus of studies that examine microbiota-host interaction, substantial effects of resident communities exerted via diverse mechanisms will be elucidated. Here we provide a perspective of the exciting emerging field that examines how the intestinal microbiota influences host susceptibility to viruses.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 102 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 27%
Researcher 28 26%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 6 6%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 11 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 47%
Immunology and Microbiology 18 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 11 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2018.
All research outputs
#4,086,184
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#4,139
of 24,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,871
of 180,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#24
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.