↓ Skip to main content

Filamentous phage infection-mediated gene expression: construction and propagation of the gIII deletion mutant helper phage R408d3

Overview of attention for article published in Gene, October 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Filamentous phage infection-mediated gene expression: construction and propagation of the gIII deletion mutant helper phage R408d3
Published in
Gene, October 1997
DOI 10.1016/s0378-1119(97)00298-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jasna Rakonjac, Goran Jovanovic, Peter Model

Abstract

We describe the use of transcriptional fusions to the phage shock protein (psp) promoter. These fusions are expressed only when cells are infected by filamentous phage. In an application, the psp promoter was fused to the protein coding part of filamentous phage gene III (gIII). Protein III (pIII) is needed to complement mutant f1 phage containing a deletion of gIII, but its synthesis also renders cells resistant to infection. By inducing pIII production from psp-gIII only in the cells that are already infected with phage, it was possible to obtain plaques from phage in which gIII had been completely deleted. gIII was deleted from two helper phages: R408 and VCSM13, which were then propagated on cells containing the psp-gIII fusion. These two phages were tested for use in a phage display method that requires generation of noninfectious, phagemid-containing virion-like particles. Both helpers worked, but R408d3 was superior to VCSM13d3, because it generated about 1800-times fewer background infectious particles.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Germany 1 1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 1%
Unknown 76 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 21%
Student > Bachelor 13 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Student > Master 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 26%
Chemistry 5 6%
Engineering 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 17 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2018.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Gene
#1,391
of 10,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,311
of 28,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gene
#11
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,914 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.