↓ Skip to main content

NMTT基を有するセフェム系抗生物質の使用後に発生した血液凝固障害の1例

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Medical Technology, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 144)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
NMTT基を有するセフェム系抗生物質の使用後に発生した血液凝固障害の1例
Published in
Japanese Journal of Medical Technology, October 2019
DOI 10.14932/jamt.19-33
Authors

木村 充, 亀谷 真実, 梶丸 弘幸, 園山 裕靖

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,174,219
of 26,614,447 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Medical Technology
#7
of 144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,361
of 380,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Medical Technology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,614,447 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them