The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of psychological first aid (PFA) system based training for frontline health workers in emergency health services in China a study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, December 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1044594 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Min Peng, Tao Xiao, Ben Carter, Pan Chen, James Shearer |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 4 | 11% |
Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Librarian | 2 | 6% |
Researcher | 2 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 18 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 21 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2022.
All research outputs
#20,747,586
of 23,347,114 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#8,105
of 10,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#344,241
of 434,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#389
of 659 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,347,114 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 659 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.