↓ Skip to main content

Back to basics: A re-evaluation of the relevance of imprinting in the genesis of Bowlby’s attachment theory

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Back to basics: A re-evaluation of the relevance of imprinting in the genesis of Bowlby’s attachment theory
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, December 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1033746
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan-Pablo Robledo, Ian Cross, Luisa Boada-Bayona, Nadine Demogeot

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Lecturer 3 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Student > Master 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 46 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 7 10%
Psychology 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 45 65%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2024.
All research outputs
#17,600,109
of 26,595,536 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#18,861
of 35,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,421
of 498,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#529
of 1,704 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,595,536 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 498,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,704 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.