Wilhelm A. J. W. Vos, Albert L. Groenendijk, Marc J. T. Blaauw, Louise E. van Eekeren, Adriana Navas, Maartje C. P. Cleophas, Nadira Vadaq, Vasiliki Matzaraki, Jéssica C. dos Santos, Elise M. G. Meeder, Janeri Fröberg, Gert Weijers, Yue Zhang, Jingyuan Fu, Rob ter Horst, Christoph Bock, Rainer Knoll, Anna C. Aschenbrenner, Joachim Schultze, Linos Vanderkerckhove, Talent Hwandih, Elizabeth R. Wonderlich, Sai V. Vemula, Mike van der Kolk, Sterre C. P. de Vet, Willem L. Blok, Kees Brinkman, Casper Rokx, Arnt F. A. Schellekens, Quirijn de Mast, Leo A. B. Joosten, Marvin A. H. Berrevoets, Janneke E. Stalenhoef, Annelies Verbon, Jan van Lunzen, Mihai G. Netea, Andre J. A. M. van der Ven
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,446,601
of 26,559,762 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#3,814
of 33,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,593
of 498,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#122
of 1,695 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,559,762 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 498,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,695 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
