The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Benefits of biobased fertilizers as substitutes for synthetic nitrogen fertilizers: Field assessment combining minirhizotron and UAV-based spectrum sensing technologies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, November 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2022.988932 |
Authors |
Hongzhen Luo, Kevin Dewitte, Sofie Landschoot, Ivona Sigurnjak, Ana A. Robles-Aguilar, Evi Michels, Stefaan De Neve, Geert Haesaert, Erik Meers |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 15% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,458,661
of 25,863,888 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#822
of 4,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,257
of 493,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#46
of 403 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,863,888 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 493,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 403 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.