The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Radial keratotomy associated endothelial degeneration
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, February 2012
|
DOI | 10.2147/opth.s28820 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Majid Moshirfar, Andrew Ollerton, Rodmehr T Semnani, Maylon Hsu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 18% |
Librarian | 1 | 9% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
Professor | 1 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 27% |
Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 73% |
Engineering | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,012,314
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#66
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,199
of 253,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.