Assessing the hidden diversity underlying consensus sequences of SARS-CoV-2 using VICOS, a novel bioinformatic pipeline for identification of mixed viral populations.
Stephanie Goya, Ezequiel Sosa, Mercedes Nabaes Jodar, Carolina Torres, Guido König, Dolores Acuña, Santiago Ceballos, Ana J Distéfano, Hernán Dopazo, María Dus Santos, Mónica Fass, Darío Fernández Do Porto, Ailen Fernández, Fernando Gallego, María I Gismondi, Ivan Gramundi, Silvina Lusso, Marcelo Martí, Melina Mazzeo, Alicia S. Mistchenko, Marianne Muñoz Hidalgo, Mónica Natale, Cristina Nardi, Julia Ousset, Andrea V Peralta, Carolina Pintos, Andrea F Puebla, Luis Pianciola, Máximo Rivarola, Adrian Turjanski, Laura Valinotto, Pablo A Vera, Jonathan Zaiat, Jeremías Zubrycki, PAIS Consortium, Paula Aulicino, Mariana Viegas
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,670,656
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Virus Research
#79
of 3,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,500
of 476,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virus Research
#3
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
