The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
RETRACTED: Empirical analysis of the integration mechanism of explicit and implicit education on the ideological and political education and impact on mental health: The perspective of new media
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, October 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1010751 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dong Hui |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 2 | 29% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 14% |
Engineering | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,947,537
of 23,485,204 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,001
of 11,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,063
of 446,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#151
of 1,522 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,204 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,522 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.