↓ Skip to main content

Difference in GFAP Levels in POCD and Non-POCD Patients After on Pump CABG

Overview of attention for article published in Vascular Health and Risk Management, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Difference in GFAP Levels in POCD and Non-POCD Patients After on Pump CABG
Published in
Vascular Health and Risk Management, December 2022
DOI 10.2147/vhrm.s386791
Pubmed ID
Authors

Widya Istanto Nurcahyo, Suharyo Hadisaputro, Zainal Muttaqin, Cindy Elfira Boom, Chandra Hermawan Manapa, Taufan Pramadika, Dodik Tugasworo

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Unknown 10 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 25%
Computer Science 1 6%
Unknown 11 69%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2023.
All research outputs
#20,905,193
of 26,560,982 outputs
Outputs from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#665
of 815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#356,824
of 506,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,560,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.