↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Application of gene editing in pathology dissection of neurodegenerative diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Application of gene editing in pathology dissection of neurodegenerative diseases
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2023
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2022.1092176
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sen Yan, Xingshun Xu, Fangfang Qi, Xing Guo, Junhong Luo, Yujing Li

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,536,746
of 26,411,386 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#2,668
of 11,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,174
of 494,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#40
of 448 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,411,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 494,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 448 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.