The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The COPII subunit MoSec24B is involved in development, pathogenicity and autophagy in the rice blast fungus
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2022.1074107 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hui Qian, Lixiao Sun, Minghua Wu, Wenhui Zhao, Mengyu Liu, Shuang Liang, Xueming Zhu, Lin Li, Zhenzhu Su, Jianping Lu, Fucheng Lin, Xiaohong Liu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Taiwan | 1 | 17% |
Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,185,918
of 25,243,120 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#5,130
of 24,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,723
of 475,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#181
of 1,338 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,243,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,291 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,338 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.