↓ Skip to main content

Use of research evidence in legislatures: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 501)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
62 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of research evidence in legislatures: a systematic review
Published in
Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, May 2024
DOI 10.1332/174426421x16656568731041
Authors

Mathieu Ouimet, Morgane Beaumier, Adrien Cloutier, Alexandre Côté, Éric Montigny, François Gélineau, Steve Jacob, Stéphane Ratté

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Librarian 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 9 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 32%
Computer Science 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2024.
All research outputs
#984,218
of 26,673,263 outputs
Outputs from Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice
#26
of 501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,976
of 344,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,673,263 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 501 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.