The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Songbird use of Floodplain and Upland Forests Along the Upper Mississippi River Corridor During Spring Migration
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ornithological Applications, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1525/cond.2012.110209 |
Authors |
Eileen M. Kirsch, Patricia J. Heglund, Brian R. Gray, Patrick Mckann |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 24 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 28% |
Researcher | 5 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 16% |
Student > Master | 4 | 16% |
Professor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 3 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 48% |
Environmental Science | 9 | 36% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 3 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2013.
All research outputs
#23,252,546
of 25,914,360 outputs
Outputs from Ornithological Applications
#2,112
of 2,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,937
of 293,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ornithological Applications
#22
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,914,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.