The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Editorial: Nanotechnology facilitated photo (electrochemcial) biosensors
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, January 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1136565 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Qing Liu, Dong Liu, Mario A. Alpuche-Aviles, Wei Ma |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 2 | 20% |
United States | 2 | 20% |
Denmark | 1 | 10% |
Russia | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,243,782
of 25,205,261 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#790
of 8,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,313
of 469,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#28
of 536 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,205,261 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,345 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 536 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.