↓ Skip to main content

Renal function and neurodegenerative diseases : a two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Overview of attention for article published in Neurological Research, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Renal function and neurodegenerative diseases : a two-sample Mendelian randomization study
Published in
Neurological Research, January 2023
DOI 10.1080/01616412.2022.2158640
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xue Liu, Ya-Nan Ou, Ya-Hui Ma, Liang-Yu Huang, Wei Zhang, Lan Tan

Abstract

Observational studies showed renal function had associations with Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), Lewy body dementia (LBD) and multiple sclerosis (MS). However, it is unknown whether these associations are causal. We use a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to investigate causal relationships between renal function and 6 neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs): AD (including familial AD), PD, LBD, frontotemporal dementia (FTD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and MS. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN), chronic kidney disease (CKD) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were used to measure renal function. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) was the predominant estimation method. The results were further validated using sensitivity analysis (i.e. MR Egger regression, Cochran Q statistic of IVW, and leave-one-out method). There was no indication of any causative relationship of BUN, CKD, or eGFR with AD, familial AD, PD, LBD, FTD and ALS (all P values >0.05). The IVW analysis demonstrated a causal relationship between eGFR and MS [odds ratio (OR), 4.89; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.43 to 16.71; P = 0.01] that was not verified in the MR-Egger and weighted median (all P values >0.05). However, no causal association of MS with BUN (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.40-2.07; P = 0.82) and CKD (OR,1.04; 95% CI, 0.88-1.23; P = 0.66) was found. There was no single SNP that affects the overall trend. Our study showed that reduced eGFR was related to MS. The value of this study is that it provides a direction for further research on the relationship between reduced eGFR and MS.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 20%
Psychology 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,293,488
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from Neurological Research
#64
of 912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,974
of 402,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurological Research
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 912 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.