The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Tourniquet application in primary total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, January 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2022.994795 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jinchang Han, Xiao-yu Zhang, Shi-yin Mu, Shi-long Liu, Qing-tong Cui, Chao Zhang, Ai-feng Liu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 25% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 17% |
Professor | 1 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 42% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,872,697
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#203
of 3,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,963
of 417,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#11
of 332 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 332 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.