The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The quantification of sodium intake from discretionary salt intake in New Zealand using the lithium-tagged salt method
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, January 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2022.1065710 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nan Xin Wang, Rachael M. McLean, Claire Cameron, Sheila A. Skeaff |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 3 | 43% |
Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2023.
All research outputs
#6,394,012
of 23,804,762 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,388
of 5,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,371
of 439,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#94
of 549 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,804,762 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 549 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.