The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Joint analysis of geodetic and earthquake fault-plane solution data to constrain magmatic sources: A case study from Kīlauea Volcano
|
---|---|
Published in |
Earth & Planetary Science Letters, December 2016
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.09.011 |
Authors |
Christelle Wauthier, Diana C. Roman, Michael P. Poland |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 46 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 21% |
Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 13% |
Unknown | 9 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 30 | 64% |
Engineering | 3 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,729,181
of 26,409,992 outputs
Outputs from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#2,073
of 5,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,854
of 422,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#43
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,409,992 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.