The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of the functional roles of fungal endophytes of Phragmites australis from high saline and low saline habitats
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biological Invasions, May 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10530-016-1160-z |
Authors |
Marcos Antônio Soares, Hai-Yan Li, Kurt P. Kowalski, Marshall Bergen, Mónica S. Torres, James Francis White |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 109 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 21% |
Researcher | 13 | 12% |
Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
Other | 21 | 19% |
Unknown | 19 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 47% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 11% |
Unspecified | 8 | 7% |
Environmental Science | 8 | 7% |
Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Unknown | 21 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,492,850
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#1,185
of 2,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,329
of 301,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#19
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.