The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Tidal and seasonal effects on survival rates of the endangered California clapper rail: does invasive Spartina facilitate greater survival in a dynamic environment?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biological Invasions, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10530-013-0634-5 |
Authors |
Cory T. Overton, Michael L. Casazza, John Y. Takekawa, Donald R. Strong, Marcel Holyoak |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 47 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 24% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 16% |
Researcher | 6 | 12% |
Professor | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 39% |
Environmental Science | 18 | 35% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 10 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2023.
All research outputs
#807,667
of 23,427,600 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#95
of 2,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,439
of 308,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,427,600 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.