The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Long-Term Comparison of Carbon Sequestration Rates in Impounded and Naturally Tidal Freshwater Marshes Along the Lower Waccamaw River, South Carolina
|
---|---|
Published in |
Wetlands, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13157-013-0456-3 |
Authors |
Judith Z. Drexler, Ken W. Krauss, M. Craig Sasser, Christopher C. Fuller, Christopher M. Swarzenski, Amber Powell, Kathleen M. Swanson, James Orlando |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 61 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 16% |
Unknown | 10 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 22 | 35% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 16% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 15% |
Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 14 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2024.
All research outputs
#5,645,170
of 26,069,033 outputs
Outputs from Wetlands
#166
of 1,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,728
of 209,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wetlands
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,069,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,420 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.